MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Latest Exam Simulator - Latest MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Test

Compared with those uninformed exam candidates who do not have effective preparing guide like our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I study braindumps, you have already won than them. Among wide array of choices, our products are absolutely perfect. Besides, from economic perspective, our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Real Questions are priced reasonably so we made a balance between delivering satisfaction to customers and doing our own jobs. So in this critical moment, our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I prep guide will make you satisfied.

Prepare for the Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam with ease using PrepAwayETE Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam questions in a convenient PDF format. Our PDF files can be easily downloaded and accessed on various devices, including PCs, laptops, Macs, tablets, and smartphones. With the Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I (MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I) PDF questions, you have the flexibility to study anytime and anywhere, eliminating the need for additional classes. Our comprehensive PDF guide contains all the essential information required to pass the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I in one shot.

>> MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Latest Exam Simulator <<

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Practice Training Materials - MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Test Dumps - PrepAwayETE

After your payment is successful, you will receive an e-mail from our system within 5-10 minutes, and then, you can use high-quality MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam guide to learn immediately. Everyone knows that time is very important and hopes to learn efficiently to pass the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam. Once they discover MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I practice materials, they will definitely want to seize the time to learn. So after payment, downloading into the exam database is the advantage of our products. The sooner you download and use MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I guide torrent, the sooner you get the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I certificate.

Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Governing Web APIs on Anypoint Platform: This topic includes sub-topics related to managing API instances and environments, selecting API policies, enforcing API policies, securing APIs, and understanding OAuth 2.0 relationships.
Topic 2	Designing APIs Using System, Process, and Experience Layers: Identifying suitable APIs for business processes, assigning them according to functional focus, and recommending data model approaches are its sub-topics.
Topic 3	Explaining Application Network Basics: This topic includes sub-topics related to identifying and differentiating between technologies for API-led connectivity, describing the role and characteristics of web APIs, assigning APIs to tiers, and understanding Anypoint Platform components.
Topic 4	Meeting API Quality Goals: This topic focuses on designing resilience strategies, selecting appropriate caching and OS usage scenarios, and describing horizontal scaling benefits.
Topic 5	Architecting and Deploying API Implementations: It covers important aspects like using auto-discovery, identifying VPC requirements, comparing hosting options and understanding testing methods. The topic also involves automated building, testing, and deploying in a DevOps setting.

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I Sample Questions (Q134-Q139):

NEW QUESTION # 134
What do the API invocation metrics provided by Anypoint Platform provide?

A. Proactive identification of likely future policy violations that exceed a given threat threshold
B. ROI metrics from APIs that can be directly shared with business users
C. Measurements of the effectiveness of the application network based on the level of reuse
D. Data on past API invocations to help identify anomalies and usage patterns across various APIs

Answer: D

Explanation:
Correct Answer : Data on past API invocations to help identify anomalies and usage patterns across various APIs
*****************************************
API Invocation metrics provided by Anypoint Platform:
>> Does NOT provide any Return Of Investment (ROI) related information. So the option suggesting it is OUT.
>> Does NOT provide any information w.r.t how APIs are reused, whether there is effective usage of APIs or not etc...
>> Does NOT prodive any prediction information as such to help us proactively identify any future policy violations.
So, the kind of data/information we can get from such metrics is on past API invocations to help identify anomalies and usage patterns across various APIs.

NEW QUESTION # 135
Which scenario is suited for MUnit tests instead of integration tests?

A. For read-only interactions to any dependencies (such as other web APIs)
B. When no mocking is permissible
C. When testing does not require knowledge of implementation details
D. For tests that are implemented using SoapUI

Answer: A

Explanation:
MUnit is MuleSoft's testing framework for creating and running automated tests within Anypoint Studio. It is specifically designed for unit testing Mule applications and is best suited when testing doesn't require understanding the inner workings or implementation details of the components being tested.
Ideal Use Cases for MUnit:
MUnit is optimal when testing individual flows, functions, or components in isolation. This type of testing focuses on verifying the behavior of each unit without needing to understand the complete system.
Since unit tests do not require external integrations or dependencies to be live, mocking is commonly used in MUnit to simulate the behavior of external services and APIs.
Why Option B is Correct:
Option B aligns with the concept of unit testing, where the emphasis is on testing functionality rather than system integration. Integration tests, on the other hand, would require implementation knowledge and live endpoints, making them unsuitable for MUnit's scope.
of Incorrect Options:
Option A (read-only interactions) and Option C (no mocking) do not suit MUnit's typical testing environment as MUnit is designed with mocking capabilities to simulate dependencies.
Option D (SoapUI-based tests) suggests an external testing tool, while MUnit is specific to MuleSoft.
Reference
For more on MUnit best practices, refer to MuleSoft's MUnit documentation.

NEW QUESTION # 136
An operations team is analyzing the effort needed to set up monitoring of their application network. They are looking at which API invocation metrics can be used to identify and predict trouble without having to write custom scripts or install additional analytics software or tools.
Which type of metrics can satisfy this goal of directly identifying and predicting failures?

A. The effectiveness of the application network based on the level of reuse
B. The number and types of API policy violations per day
C. The number and types of past API invocations across the application network
D. The ROI from each APT invocation

Answer: B

Explanation:
To monitor an application network and predict issues without custom scripts, policy violation metrics are critical. They provide insights into potential problems by tracking instances where API usage does not conform to defined policies. Here's why this approach is suitable:
Predictive Monitoring:
Tracking API policy violations (such as rate limits or spike controls being hit) can indicate surges in traffic or misuse, which may lead to throttling or service degradation if not addressed.
By monitoring these violations, teams can proactively adjust limits or optimize API handling to prevent actual failures.
No Custom Scripting Needed:
Policy violation metrics are available within MuleSoft's Anypoint Monitoring, meaning there's no need to implement custom solutions or external tools to gather and interpret this data.
of Incorrect Options:
Option B (effectiveness based on reuse) does not directly predict failures.
Option C (past invocation counts) offers historical usage data but does not inherently identify issues.
Option D (ROI from API invocation) is a business metric and does not provide technical insights for failure prediction.
Reference
For more details on leveraging policy violation metrics for proactive monitoring, refer to MuleSoft documentation on Anypoint Monitoring.

NEW QUESTION # 137
Mule applications that implement a number of REST APIs are deployed to their own subnet that is inaccessible from outside the organization.
External business-partners need to access these APIs, which are only allowed to be invoked from a separate subnet dedicated to partners - called Partner-subnet. This subnet is accessible from the public internet, which allows these external partners to reach it.
Anypoint Platform and Mule runtimes are already deployed in Partner-subnet. These Mule runtimes can already access the APIs.
What is the most resource-efficient solution to comply with these requirements, while having the least impact on other applications that are currently using the APIs?

A. Implement (or generate) an API proxy Mule application for each of the APIs, then deploy the API proxies to the Mule runtimes
B. Add an additional endpoint to each API for partner-enablement consumption
C. Redeploy the API implementations to the same servers running the Mule runtimes
D. Duplicate the APIs as Mule applications, then deploy them to the Mule runtimes

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 138
A client has several applications running on the Salesforce service cloud. The business requirement for integration is to get daily data changes from Account and Case Objects. Data needs to be moved to the client's private cloud AWS DynamoDB instance as a single JSON and the business foresees only wanting five attributes from the Account object, which has 219 attributes (some custom) and eight attributes from the Case Object.
What design should be used to support the API/ Application data model?

A. Create separate entities for Account with five attributes and Case with eight attributes in SAPI, which are combined by the PAPI to provide JSON output containing 13 attributes.
B. Start implementing an Enterprise Data Model by defining enterprise Account and Case Objects and implement SAPI and DynamoDB tables based on the Enterprise Data Model,
C. Create separate entities for Account and Case Objects by mimicking all the attributes in SAPI, which are combined by the PAPI and filtered to provide JSON output containing 13 attributes.
D. Request client's AWS project team to replicate all the attributes and create Account and Case JSON table in DynamoDB. Then create separate entities for Account and Case Objects by mimicking all the attributes in SAPI to transfer ISON data to DynamoD for respective Objects

Answer: A

Explanation:
Understanding the Requirements:
The business needs to transfer daily data changes from the Salesforce Account and Case objects to AWS DynamoDB in a single JSON format.
Only a subset of attributes (5 from Account and 8 from Case) is required, so it is not necessary to include all 219 attributes of the Account object.
Design Approach:
A System API (SAPI) should be created for each Salesforce object (Account and Case), exposing only the required fields (5 attributes for Account and 8 for Case).
A Process API (PAPI) can be used to aggregate and transform the data from these SAPIs, combining the 13 selected attributes from Account and Case into a single JSON structure for DynamoDB.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Mimicking all attributes in the SAPI is inefficient and unnecessary, as only 13 attributes are required.
Option B: Replicating all attributes in DynamoDB is excessive and would result in higher storage and processing costs, which is unnecessary given the requirement for only a subset of attributes.
Option C: Implementing an Enterprise Data Model could be useful in broader data management but is not required here, as the focus is on a lightweight integration.
Option D (Correct Answer): Creating separate entities in SAPI for Account and Case with only the required attributes and using the PAPI to aggregate them into a single JSON is the most efficient and meets the requirements effectively.
Conclusion:
Option D is the best choice as it provides a lightweight, efficient design that meets the requirements by transferring only the necessary attributes and minimizing resource use.
Refer to MuleSoft's best practices for API-led connectivity and data modeling to structure SAPIs and PAPIs efficiently.

NEW QUESTION # 139
......

The learning material is available in three different easy-to-use forms. The first one is a PDF form. The students can save the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I questions by taking out their prints or can access them on their smartphones, tablets, and laptops. The PDF form can be used anywhere anytime and is essential for applicants who like to learn from their smart devices. The second form is Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I (MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I) web-based practice test which can be taken from browsers like Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, and Safari.

Latest MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Test: https://www.prepawayete.com/Salesforce/MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I-practice-exam-dumps.html